The study is a continuation of a previous one, published in the „Romanian Intellectual Pr105operty Magazine” issue 2/2018, under the topic Opinions concerning the rephrasing of the syntagms „utility models” and „technical inventions”, used in the Law no. 350/2007 regarding utility models. The idea of this study was suggested to us by our younger colleague, Lucian Tarnu, PhD student. Following his suggestions, we have though it useful to resort to an in‑depth review of the previous argumentation regarding the fact that the syntagms „utility model” and „technical invention”, present in the contents of the Law no. 350/2007 on utility models, are not adequate from a logical and legal point of view and to propose suitable normative remedies. Moreover, following the same suggestions, we have shown that, as compared to the provisions in the Law no. 64/1991 on patents, Law no. 350/2007 comprises numerous parallelisms, contrary to the legislative technique norms for the adoption of normative acts.
⁕⁕ Lector univ. Lucian Tarnu.
⁕⁕⁕ Drd. Tiberiu Giurea, Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu.