Alisa Toma*

Abstract

A dentist broadcasting phonograms in his/her practice, in the presence of his/her patients, as ambient music, may not reasonably expect an increase in the number of his/her clients solely as a result of such broadcast, nor increase the prices of the services provided. Therefore, the broadcasting of phonograms is not an aspect inherent to the dental care practice, and a dentist’s clients go to a dental practice with the sole aim of being provided with dental care services. The dentist’s clients have access to certain phonograms in an incidental manner and independently of their wishes, in accordance with the time when they arrive at the dental practice and during their waiting, as well as according to the nature of the treatment that is provided.

 

* Doctorand al Academiei de poliție „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, inspector în cadrul Inspectoratului de Poliție al Județului Hunedoara, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Bujorel Florea*

Abstract

This study follows up on the efforts initiated by the author for investigating the legislative amendments and supplements of offenses regulated by Law No. 8/1996, made by Law No. 187/2012 for the implementation of the new Criminal Code.

The article analyzes the amendments to the offense of making available to the public the works or products bearing related rights and sui generis rights of database manufacturers, which is provided for under Article 1398 of Law No. 8/1996.

The author presents personal and doctrinal views in the area considered, dwelling on the rationale and the way to regulate the incrimination examined and proposing schemes for interpreting and enforcing the relevant statutory provisions.

 

 

* Conf. univ. dr. la Facultatea de Drept și Administrație Publică București Universitatea „Spiru Haret”, Avocat Baroul București, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Andreea Livădariu*

Abstract

Plagiarism or lack of originality? Plagiarism or inaccurate citation? What does it mean to plagiarize? These are the answers we will try to fiind in the paper below, considering the Copyright Law (no. 8/1996) and the Law no. 206/2004 regarding ethics in scientific research.

Taking a passage from a work without indicating the author and the title may be seen, at first sight, as a theft, an act which is blamed in the academic world and not only. But defining plagiarism is not as simple as it seems and there are some criteria which must be taken account of when analysing such an accusation. About these criteria is the present paper which has the aim to clarify some aspects concerning plagiarism.

 

* Doctorand, Univeristatea Nicolae Titulescu din București, Facultatea de Drept; avocat Baroul București (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).

Adrian Dănilă*

Abstract

The article presents brief considerations on the notion of plagiarism.

Plagiarism is a fact that lately has become more pronounced in high school and university environments.

Concerns and issues of copyright in accordance with the notion of plagiarism, and outlines the comments on this issue, highlighted by the best specialists of intellectual property.

Unfortunately we have to work about people's mentality, to explain that alone should deepen and research to achieve material to raise the status of creative effort submit both physically and intellectually on after which even have the satisfaction of having achieved something on his own and that is your own creation.

People should be trained in the sense of respecting intellectual property as it is necessary for them to know that although it may inspire other texts, articles, they can not reproduce them as personal creations.

It can be concluded that plagiarism has kept the original meaning, namely theft, because the intellectual property of a person should be respected and defended in the same way that defends its ephemeral material goods.

 

* Doctor în drept, comisar șef la Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Ialomița, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Ciprian Raul Romițan*

Abstract

In Romanian law, computer programs fall within the category of literary works protected by copyright. For this purpose, Chapter IX of Law No. 8/1996 on copyright and related rights is dedicated to computer programs and it takes over the protection rules laid down in Council Directive No. 91/250/EEC of 14 May 1991 on the legal protection of computer programs, which states in Article 1 that “Member States shall protect computer programs, by copyright, as literary works within the meaning of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works”.

Such protection shall extend by law to all forms of expression of the intellectual creation of the author of a computer program. However, it is stated that the ideas and principles which underlie any element of a computer program, including those which underlie its interfaces, are not protected by copyright under that Directive.

 

* Doctor în drept, Avocat asociat SCA „Roș și asociații”, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

  1. UNLICENSED SOFTWARE AND CYBER SECURITY THREATS

Partners